1
In this article, the author focuses on some comparisons between existing concepts, like left to right, bottom to top and big and small. In my opinion, the author wants to tell us we should have more than one points of view but not just follow the inertial thinking when we consider things.
I find this article is hard to read, I have no idea who the enemy is at the beginning of reading and I am still not sure what is the main idea of the article. In another word, I do not know if I understand his idea correctly. I think it is better for him to add a paragraph to explain his main idea, which will help readers understand.
2
For something I dislike in this article. I think the followed part of the history of basketball is boring. which makes the article look like wikipedia. Well, at least for me, I hate history, so I will fall into sleep reading so long a history of basketball without any personal ideas from the author.
3
I am interested in this one because it is about modern computer technology. Computing abilities of human are limited but wisdom of human is unlimited. By computer, human can make many of their unimaginable thoughts come true. And simulating a human face by software is like a magic, I hope I will see a real film with no real human actors but all digital "stars".
"We ask ourselves that question every day," one of the guys at ILM acknowledged, laughing. "Fortunately, it's not our job to answer it." I am interested in this question but the author does not explain more on it in the followed parts. Can digital characters replace real human actors to the end?
